Madison County makes history with generous taxpayer support of museum
Most county historical societies in Illinois rely on donations and memberships, but the Madison County Historical Society receives a generous infusion of tax dollars to run its museum and library. County leaders just cut the total, but why do they provide taxpayer support at all?
In 1923, the Madison County Board allocated $500 to the Madison County Historical Society “for the purpose of fitting up the room in the court house which has been set aside for historical purposes.”
It was a historic moment, because most other counties in Illinois don’t use tax dollars to support their history museums.
Of 50 county historical societies surveyed in Illinois, only five receive tax dollars. Madison County by far spends the most, last year handing the history museum and library $273,293 in taxpayer money. In second place was McLean County, with $65,708 in taxes going to its history museum.
The taxpayer burden from the Madison County history museum increased 82 percent during the past decade, with the budget growing from $149,989 in 2009 to this past year’s peak. In total, the county sent $1.9 million to the history museum from 2009 to 2018.
But the new fiscal year will be leaner for the museum. County leaders stuck to their pledge to keep the property tax levy flat, so they cut $80,000 from the museum’s 2019 budget. It will receive $194,899 in 2019.
A museum board member tried to persuade county leaders to spread the cut across all county departments, which he said would cost each department about $2,400.
“The current budget proposal for 2019 calls for approximately an $80,000 reduction in the museum budget. This cut is a 30 percent reduction of the museum budget,” said Steve Hansen, a member of the historical society’s board. “Now let me remind you of some of the consequences. First, is a reduction of staff. Second, is a reduction in hours of operation. Third, is of services to the public. And fourth, is a reduction in our ability to preserve documents and artifacts.”
Which raises the question: Why isn’t Madison County’s history museum entirely funded by private donations, as are the vast majority of its peer entities? Why are taxes being used at all?
That’s a good question, Madison County Chairman Kurt Prenzler said during an interview.
“I think we’d like to see the historical society become more robust in its fundraising,” he said. “We’ve kind of been signaling that to them.”
He said the county subsidized the museum from its general fund, but is shrinking that help as the budget gets tighter and as a former surplus in the museum’s account is depleted. Still, there is a museum property tax levy of .002 cents per $100 assessed valuation that will bring in $101,270 this year.
The property tax was approved by county voters around 1964, when the museum moved out of the courthouse and into the historic Weir House in Edwardsville, said longtime employee and archive manager Mary Westerhold. She said the board understands county leaders intend to decrease support, and are looking at fundraising options mainly aimed at completing museum renovations.
Prenzler said he’s sympathetic to the museum’s mission and its many volunteers. He also said he’s an advocate of benchmarking: If Madison County stands out among counties and their support of historical societies, then the issue should be examined.
When Republicans in 2016 gained the majority on the Madison County Board as well as the chairmanship for the first time in decades, they did so with the promise to shrink government and be responsible with taxes. One way to save a quick $194,899 would be to end taxpayer support for the Madison County Historical Society. Nearly half of that money could be cut directly by county leaders, the other half would require elimination of a property tax voters approved more than 50 years ago.
Annie Wheeler Burton, the society’s historian in 1923, wrote that the initial $500 went to two display cases: “This is the first step taken towards permanency by the society, and no doubt will be followed by the contribution of many interesting articles.”
The collection was intended to be permanent. No one promised the tax dollars would be.