Sign Up for Our E-Newsletter   

OfficeMax seeks Illinois tax break
6/19/2013
Institute on Fox Illinois: Potential For Compromise On Pension Reform Unclear
6/19/2013
Institute on ABC 7: Illinois' $17-million-a-day pension crisis, by the numbers
6/19/2013
Daily Links for June 19
6/19/2013
Chicago Public Schools looking for cash can start by ending teacher pickups
6/19/2013
State should stop redistributing tax dollars to locals in favor of broad tax relief
6/18/2013
Institute on ABC 20: Potential For Compromise On Pension Reform Unclear
6/18/2013
Institute on ABC 7: Bill Daley proposes plan to end pension deadlock
6/18/2013
Institute on WREX: State lawmakers support new pension reform proposal
6/18/2013
Daily Links for June 18
6/18/2013
Institute in Richmond Times-Dispatch: Will Virginians bail out irresponsible states?
Share |

8/26/2012




While Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell and the General Assembly have worked hard to stabilize our state's retirement system — which is relied upon by those who work and have worked for our state and local governments — other states have not done as well. And there seems to be growing efforts by those states, which have allowed their retirement systems to truly become anchors on their fiscal health, to hope for a federal bailout.


States such as California and Illinois truly face huge financial problems due to what seems to be irresponsible inaction to stop their retirement systems from becoming enormous liabilities. And the financial meltdown of the past decade by various groups has taught America an expensive lesson: When big institutions face financial crisis, the federal government is all too eager to bail them out.

Wall Street: The federal government stepped in with the Troubled Asset Relief Program. General Motors: Uncle Sam bought into the company instead of allowing the legal bankruptcy system to resolve that problem in a more equitable manner. The housing collapse: The feds are still messing around and costing us billions.

A commercial loan collapse could be right in front of us, and Washington will likely move to bail out that problem, with the taxpayers left on the hook once again.

* * * * *

Now, a growing crisis is coming to a head, and it could significantly add to our economic problems. State-run pension systems across the country are grossly underfunded, to the tune of $2.5 trillion. Those pension systems — and the states that run them — could be the next target of a federal bailout.

If that happens, Virginia taxpayers should be worried, because we could be forced to foot a big part of that bill.

For years, states such as Illinois and California have created incredibly generous retirement programs and then failed to responsibly fund those pension systems. Those unpaid bills are adding up, and without reform some states may collapse under the weight of this debt. Already, the conservative estimate of $2.5 trillion in pension shortfalls represents more than one-sixth of the entire U.S. economy.

It's alarming how long it took politicians to acknowledge this massive problem. Just as with Social Security, the financial inability of the state systems to fund their promises was clearly sitting there for anyone to see.


In Washington, crises seem to spring up overnight, and quick fixes that seem absurd today — such as a state pension bailout — suddenly become "reasonable" answers.


But it seems pretty clear that most taxpayers don't want another bailout. Not only do the taxpayers feel that we can't afford it, but it has become clear over the past few years that bailouts reward failure. Bailing out irresponsible states would send the message that fiscal discipline doesn't matter because someone else will come along and take care of the bills.

And bailouts punish success. States such as Virginia are working hard to become economically competitive by reining in spending and prioritizing their efforts. These states won't benefit from a bailout; instead, they'll be stuck paying for other states' mismanagement.


Is it really good policy to tell states that if they act responsibly, they'll end up on the hook for those that don't?

* * * * *
The Illinois Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank in Chicago, has developed a model to illustrate the impact of a federal bailout of state pension debt.

In a bailout scenario, the federal government would have to raise taxes and cut federal spending to finance a bailout. States with the biggest pension liabilities — such as Illinois — would benefit tremendously from a bailout, while most other states would only suffer.

Virginia's pension system, for example, has fared much better than Illinois'. But if a federal bailout were enacted, Virginia would be among the states hit the hardest. The commonwealth would pay a price as high as $29 billion, which would need to be paid for by higher taxes levied on Virginia residents or severe cuts in services. In this situation, fiscally prudent Virginia would lose.


There's no denying that states' pension funds are in trouble. But what they need are state-based reforms — not a federal bailout.

A bailout would make states like Virginia pay for mistakes made in California and Illinois. That's not only bad economics — it's just plain wrong.


Michael W. Thompson is chairman and president of the Virginia-based Thomas Jefferson Institute. Ted Dabrowski is the vice president of policy at the Illinois Policy Institute.


Illinois Policy Institute Privacy Policy | © Copyright 2013, Illinois Policy Institute