Sign Up for Our E-Newsletter   

Motorists in Illinois are paying $4.06 per gallon of gas — $0.40 more than the national average.
5/24/2013
Open bargaining essential to avoid government corruption
5/24/2013
Institute on WJPF Radio: Tom Miller and John Tillman discuss pension cost-shift proposal
5/23/2013
Failed “Amazon tax” heads to Illinois Supreme Court
5/23/2013
Institute on WQAD 8: Pension “pick-up” for teachers under fire
5/23/2013
CPS school closings: district spares some schools, but problems still persist
5/23/2013
Daily Links for May 23
5/23/2013
New study finds that Medicaid doesn't improve health outcomes
5/23/2013
Taxing the Net: Lessons from Illinois
5/23/2013
Illinois speed limit hike goes to Gov. Quinn
5/22/2013
Debate Squelched on Fake Spending Limit Reform, Vote Today?
Share |

1/4/2011
by Kristina Rasmussen

Featured Research: Spending Limit Flaws
 
Controlling future growth of government spending is key to solving the state’s budget crisis. Tax and expenditure limits are a good way to ensure that government outlays do not grow faster than the public’s ability to pay. All spending limits are not created equal, however. A full House vote on fake reform could happen as early as today. Read on!
 
The Illinois Policy Institute reviewed a spending limit introduced by Rep. Keith Farnham, and it has some commendable provisions. Notably, it relies on a spending limit tied to per capita personal income growth. Had this limit been in place from fiscal years 1997 to 2009, Illinois would have saved a cumulative $29.4 billion over actual general spending.
 
Even so, we discovered serious flaws in the legislation, including an “emergency” loophole and an exemption of pensions from the spending cap. The Institute sought to offer constructive suggestions for language improvement at a House committee hearing on Monday.
 
It’s notable that Speaker Mike Madigan—and not Rep. Farnham—testified in favor of the bill at the hearing. When it came time for others to speak on the bill, the presiding chairwoman refused to allow outside opponents to offer oral remarks. She sustained her decision to limit testimony even after Rep. Mike Bost pointed out that hearings were meant to solicit input from the public. The committee then voted 10-4 to pass the bill.
 
As written, the spending limit should give fiscal reformers serious pause. Rather than promoting budgetary responsibility, its loopholes could be used to institutionalize an unaffordable level of government spending. The Pension Funding & Fairness Act offers a better path forward for true budgetary restraint that will lead to a more prosperous Illinois.
 
Contact information for your legislator can be found here.
 
Read a summary of committee developments, our written testimony with suggestions for improvements, as well as a detailed budgetary analysis.
 
Recent Media Coverage

Post a Comment


Type in the characters that you see in the above picture
*Name:
*Email:
*Comments:
*required
Illinois Policy Institute Privacy Policy | © Copyright 2013, Illinois Policy Institute